On Aug 12, 2014, at 4:01 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2014, at 12:39 PM, Sean Farley wrote: >>> Anyone who had the previous file, including our automated systems, will now >>> encounter a checksum mismatch. To fix this please follow the recipe for >>> stealth updates: >>> >>> http://trac.macports.org/wiki/PortfileRecipes#stealth-updates >> >> Why isn't this automatically done for revision bumps? This seems like >> another task that is needlessly manual. > > A revision increase does not imply that a stealth update has occurred. A > stealth update is a rare occurrence and port authors must manually indicate > in a port when this has happened because how would you suggest we > automatically infer that this has happened?
it wouldn't be horrible if setting a revision just changed dist_subdir automatically (even when it's not necessary), which I think is what Sean was suggesting. -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
