On Aug 12, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's still not totally automatic: the developer still has to update the > checksums, so if the developer is sufficiently aware that the checksums need > to be updated, why can't the developer also follow the stealth update recipe? > This hasn't been a problem before.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I also don't think it's a bad idea to at least think about possible ways to reduce friction for people contributing to MacPorts. -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
