On Aug 12, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 12, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> it wouldn't be horrible if setting a revision just changed dist_subdir >> automatically (even when it's not necessary), which I think is what Sean was >> suggesting. > > In addition, a stealth update does not imply that the revision needs to be > increased. Sometimes a change in a distfile does not warrant a rebuild. As > explained in the recipe.
If I understand Sean right, he's just looking for areas where we can automate/simplify processes. I don't really care about the specific case of stealth-upgrades, but it would be possible to trade some disk space/network/something else to make the process easier for portfile developers. -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
