Anders F Björklund wrote: > Emmanuel Hainry wrote: >> The only missing link is that port does not download those packages, >> but it should not be more difficult than what 'port mirror' does for >> distfiles! Well obviously, there is another gap: those packages >> don't get uploaded anywhere at the moment, but you should feel free to >> share your packages. > > Sure it does, with a patch. :-) > > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/8571 (3 years ago) > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/10919 (2 years) > > It just hasn't been added yet... > > > One problem with the current system is that the archives > are sorted by OS and Arch, but not including OS version. > That is, the binaries for Tiger and Leopard would go to > the same file path - unless having a platform variant... > > It also needs digests (e.g. SHA) and signatures (e.g GPG) > as well as better metadata, however those are achieved ? > You should take this up on MacPorts Dev, if you want to > improve it. It's still stalling on the build logs, I think.
That and registry support for the extra info. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
