Me too. I certainly don't have any interest in turning this into another
/usr/local rehash, for sure, as that is pointless.
Just recognizing what is going on out there, and trying to stay as relevant as
possible in a VHS / Beta sorta way.
homebrew is easier to use, and works for 99% of people without any trouble.
MacPorts is better in most ways, but a bit harder to use, and has more of a
learning curve to it.
Once you start installing _all_ software using a Portfile, I find it's way
easier to use MacPorts.
On 2018-02-14, at 2:13 PM, Peter West wrote:
> One of the reasons I prefer MacPorts is that it does NOT install in
> I am still in the habit of thinking that /usr/local is a system directory
> that is expected to be inaccessible to the masses (me in this case.) Some
> independent installers, like that for mysql, installed in /usr/local, and I
> presume the thinking is similar.
> When Apple declared open season on /usr/local, was it because of the
> difficulties posed by SIP, or did it precede that?
> I’ve had some success installing brew in /opt/homebrew, despite dire warnings
> not to.
>> On 15 Feb 2018, at 5:46 am, Ken Cunningham <ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com>
>> In a recent poll
>> <https://www.slant.co/versus/1588/1674/~macports_vs_homebrew>, homebrew was
>> recommended 375 to 25 over MacPorts.
>> 2. symlinks into /usr/local therefore:
>> a) no adjustments needed to path
>> b) no need for sudo
>> c) third-party apps, libraries, and xcode projects can be downloaded and
>> built or run, and the system looks there by default, so need no modification
>> to build or run.
> Peter West
> “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”