A link was supplied in the initial message, not the contents of the article. I think in the best interest of the list, I'll reframe posting any further articles I find, which may be of interest. That link will direct you to the source and from there you can subscribe and acquire the same information as I have.
On Jul 11, 2009, at 3:49 PM, kaare dehard wrote: > > maybe a compromise here folks, we may wish to keep the content off but > make a link available to said publicly accessible web site to keep all > happy? > > Seems to me that we can both satisfy our curiosity as well as honoring > the spirit of the list. > On 11-Jul-09, at 2:05 PM, Buddy Brannan wrote: > >> >> >> On Jul 11, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Alex Jurgensen wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Scott: >>> >>> This is not infomration that can be disclosed so I'd advise you keep >>> it off list. >> >> Really? SO, like, that it came from a publicly accessible Web site >> doesn't figure in at all, I suppose? >> >> >>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
