Hi, Scott: Agreed. I too take NDA's seriously. It was for this reason that I posted hastily. It was so that you andthe list would be safe, and not for harm. Again, I will say thatI was wrong, and all and should not have been hasty. Short timing has no excuse hidden in its depths for hasiness.
Keep posting, Alex, On 11-Jul-09, at 5:18 PM, Scott Howell wrote: > > Alex, apology accepted and I am very sensitive to the issue of NDAs. > I've been under NDAs on and off for a number of years and I take them > very seriously. So, I am a little touchy perhaps. :) > The big problem is folks don't understand that violating a NDA can > harm the future participation for more than the violator and I think > you know what I mean. > > On Jul 11, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Alex Jurgensen wrote: > >> Hi, >> Scott: >> >> I appologize. The article did at first glance look non-NDA >> compliant, but I see after all that it was. >> >> I appologize and beg your forgiveness. >> >> Regards, >> Alex, > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
