Hi Buddy,

Other than the NFB review--which was just stupid--I can honestly say I
haven't run into this on the Windows side.  But I can say that if I did, I'd
say exactly the same thing.
Cheers,
Donna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Buddy Brannan
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 12:39 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 3 features that hmm?
> 
> 
> I agree: choice is not a bad thing. I use all three (Windows, Mac, and
> GNU/Linux) for different things. While my main fun downtime machine is
> a Mac, I definitely still use Windows for some things and in some
> situations. I also have a couple of things I do where GNU/Linux is the
> best choice. It's all good, and I say if it works for you, use it and
> be productive. If something else works for you, use that.
> 
> While I've seen some Windows is the antichrist stuff here and on the
> GNU/Linux lists, I've seen similar, though different, things on the
> Windows side, mostly to do with people thinking that these are not
> viable alternatives at all, or not useful, or that those of us who use
> non-Windows alternatives are only doing so out of some cultish need to
> not use Microsoft products simply for the fact that they come from
> Microsoft. While I don't deny there is sometimes a certain amount of
> that latter attitude with some of us, it's no different, and no less
> divisive, than the "Windows is the antichrist" attitude. It just
> manifests itself differently.
> --
> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 30, 2009, at 3:39 AM, James & Nash wrote:
> 
> >
> > Donnna, I could not have said it better myself. No, Windows is not
> the
> > darkside and I feel I have to say that whenever I listen to Windows
> or
> > Windows AT related podcasts which I do regularly, I have never - as
> > far as i
> > can remember heard these folks disparage Apple's efforts. There are
> of
> > course those in the AT and Windows communities who have dismissed
> > the Mac
> > out of hand, but these narrow minded folks are few and far between.
> >
> > I think we can all agree that people should use what works for them
> > - or
> > what works for them in a given situation - whether that be Linux,
> > Mac or
> > Windows is irrelevant. Yes, Apple has made great steps forward in the
> > accessibility of Mac OS X, Windows AT developers  and Microsoft have
> > also
> > done the same for Windows as have Linux folks. As you said, there are
> > definite weaknesses to both - indeeed all the OS's as there are
> > definite
> > advantages. None of these operating systems are in any way perfect
> > but we
> > should respect everyone and their choice.
> >
> > I am not criticizing anyone - personally, I think it's a good thing
> > that
> > Apple have added the ability for people to decide on how they want
> > to edit
> > as well as other things. It is always nice and convenient to have
> > options
> > and multiple ways of doing things.
> >
> > Take care all
> >
> > James
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Donna Goodin" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 4:06 AM
> > Subject: RE: 3 features that hmm?
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I have to support Rich here.  The attitude displayed by many Mac
> >> users
> >> toward Windows, and toward Windows users who are doing their best
> >> to learn
> >> the Mac OS is frankly despicable.  Many mac users--definitely not
> >> all--are
> >> nothing more than a bunch of narrow-minded snobs.  Windows is not
> >> "the
> >> dark
> >> side".  It is a viable choice, perhaps a better choice for some
> >> people.
> >> JAWS and Windows worked very well for me for nearly 20 years.  I am
> >> only
> >> here because I want to support Apple's efforts, not because I
> believe
> >> Windows or JAWS to be the devil incarnate.  Yes, editing is
> >> different.
> >> Those who prefer editing in Windows are not wrong, they just prefer
> >> something different.  They are entitled to that preference, just as
> >> all on
> >> this list are entitled to their preference for the Mac.  If Apple
> >> implements
> >> some choices to facilitate transition from Windows, there's nothing
> >> wrong
> >> with that.  No one has to use it unless they want to.
> >>
> >> Personally, I think it's great that there are multiple alternatives
> >> now
> >> available for blind users.  Yes, what Apple has done for
> >> accessibility is
> >> tremendous.  That said, I just applied for a job at a place where
> >> they
> >> pretty much come out and tell you that if you choose to use a Mac,
> >> you
> >> won't
> >> be able to utilize all of their materials.  So, if I get that
> >> position,
> >> I'll
> >> be using Windows for all things work-related.  I therefore hope that
> >> Windows
> >> continues to be a viable option for blind users.  The best possible
> >> scenario
> >> for us is to have as many options as possible, so that each of us
> can
> >> decide
> >> which is the best fit for us and for our immediate needs.  The Mac
> >> has
> >> many
> >> things to recommend it.  But you all who choose to use it, are in
> >> no way
> >> superior to anyone else, and you have no right to disdain others who
> >> either
> >> choose the Windows option, or are willing to point out the Mac's
> >> weaknesses.
> >> And yes, the Mac does have very definite weaknesses, as does
> Windows.
> >>
> >> Why can't we all just be supportive and respectful of one another?
> I
> >> think
> >> the thing I find saddest about this whole movement toward the Mac,
> >> is the
> >> way it seems to polarize everyone.  Let's just support  each
> person's
> >> right
> >> to find what works best for them and be happy about that.
> >>
> >> Donna
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: [email protected]
> >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rich Ring
> >>> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:16 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: 3 features that hmm?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> With all respect, I am sure there was a time when you were a
> >>> beginner.
> >>> I am
> >>> an extremely competent Windows user.  This doesn't in and of itself
> >>> make me
> >>> the spawn of Satan, it is simply a statement concerning my current
> >>> technological status.  One of the things that has kept me from
> >>> purchasing a
> >>> Mac until today is the condescending manner in which some
> (certainly
> >>> not
> >>> all) Mac users treat those of us who are investigating this
> >>> pltform who
> >>> have
> >>> been Windows users.
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Marie Howarth" <[email protected]>
> >>> To: <[email protected]>
> >>> Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 7:45 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: 3 features that hmm?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> think I did say I was glad of the choice, just sad apple had to
> >>> accomodate those who find it impossible to edit text in the way it
> >>> is
> >>> meant to be edited. they are features that yes, fine they are here
> >>> now, just weren't really missing in my opinion. If others need
> their
> >>> screen reader to hold their hand cool. whatever everyone needs. as
> I
> >>> stated, opinion, that's all. everyone's allowed those :)
> >>>
> >>> On Aug 30, 2009, at 1:39 AM, Scott Howell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Come on this is crazy. You just can't imagine the number of people
> >>> who
> >>>> bitched and complained about this whole editing issue and I
> believe
> >>>> Apple was taken to task by one of the rags put out by the NFB or
> >>>> some
> >>>> organization about the editing issue.  APparently enough people
> >>>> complained that Apple was trying to provide the flexibility for
> >>>> those
> >>>> users who need it.  Yeah, I am one of the Scotts who made this
> >>>> point
> >>>> because I remember clearly the noise about this editing issue.  I
> >>>> see
> >>>> no benefit in removing it and quite frankly since it's here,
> >>>> whatever
> >>>> at this point.  If it really helps someone , fine because there
> are
> >>>> those who would simply not consider the Mac for this reason.  It
> is
> >>> an
> >>>> option and not a default and that is why it's a feature not worth
> >>>> removing. My point is you have to think beyond what you have
> stated
> >>>> and I don't entirely disagree with your point of what is or is
> >>>> not a
> >>>> standard way of editing etc.  At the same time, it obviously
> didn't
> >>>> take a great deal of effort to implement it and at least it is an
> >>>> option.
> >>>> On Aug 29, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also just my oppinion, but I disagree about points 1 and 2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can't say I ever have used feature numero uno in any OS as there
> >>>>> are
> >>>>> so few webpages I'd actually want to read 100% of their content,
> >>>>> but
> >>>>> someone somewhere will find it useful.  You could argue that the
> >>>>> reading webpages automatically is as close as Apple could get to
> a
> >>>>> sighted person glancing at the screen when the page comes up and
> >>>>> taking in the bigger picture, which we can't do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Voiceover hints are definitely useful and a good thing.  Context
> >>>>> sensitive help like that enables most people to be on a way
> >>>>> shorter
> >>>>> learning curve usually than reading a whole manual and trying to
> >>>>> apply
> >>>>> things to a ton of situations at once.  It's annoying that
> they're
> >>>>> enabled by default for you or I perhaps, but newbies are going to
> >>>>> thank Apple for it no doubt.  Come to that, so will developers
> who
> >>>>> fire up VO for the first time when they receive a disgruntled
> >>>>> email
> >>>>> from someone who's asking them to make adjustments to their
> >>>>> applications.  It'll instantly demonstrate to them the difference
> >>>>> between what works and what doesn't, it gives them instructions
> >>>>> equally as precise as that email from the VI user would in most
> >>>>> cases.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Wholeheartedly agreed about point 3 though.  I just don't get
> this
> >>>>> one.  You also hit the nail right on the head with the reason the
> >>>>> option shouldn't exist, it modifies a standard that doesn't in
> any
> >>>>> way
> >>>>> need to be modified, purely because of some VI people's rut that
> >>>>> they're firmly jammed into.  To add weight to a big sweeping
> >>> oppinion
> >>>>> like that, I should say that I was raised on Windows, still use
> >>>>> Windows more often than many on here I expect, and I make my fair
> >>>>> share of mistakes editing in Mac OS if I haven't done any in a
> >>> while.
> >>>>> I don't see this option as the solution, I see it as cheating.  I
> >>>>> doubt that many people will see this as an option to ease their
> >>>>> progression into Mac OS as one of the other Scott's suggested,
> >>>>> human's
> >>>>> just don't work that way, for the most part we're creatures of
> >>>>> habit
> >>>>> even if they're bad ones.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tricky one though isn't it.  Emailing Apple and asking that a
> >>> feature
> >>>>> be removed seems somehow wrong in my mind.  In any case, I'm not
> >>> sure
> >>>>> they'd get it.  I just tried to explain why I disagree with the
> >>>>> feature and what's potentially at stake here to a sighted mac
> >>>>> user,
> >>>>> and she point blank didn't get it.  I'm not sure that anyone who
> >>>>> hasn't had to appreciate how cool mainstream technology that
> works
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> us out of the box would, even Apple themselves might not, they
> >>>>> probably see the introduction of this feature as the best thing
> >>>>> they
> >>>>> could've done to silence a lot of whinging lol.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just my 2 cents, or perhaps pennies worth for those on this side
> >>>>> of
> >>>>> the pond...
> >>>>> Scott
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 8/29/09, Scott Howell <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Well good for you, I'm glad you did not need these features and
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>> learned the way we all started out.  However, of course the only
> >>>>>> plus
> >>>>>> side is that for those who want to make the transition and
> really
> >>>>>> find
> >>>>>> what we "grew up with" difficult, will at least have a way to
> >>>>>> ease
> >>>>>> their transition over from the dark side. :)  So, I agree with
> >>>>>> you,
> >>>>>> but these are small prices to pay if it will truly help someone
> >>> make
> >>>>>> the transition.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 29, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Marie Howarth wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> well, this is purely my opinion but 3 features that horribly
> >>>>>>> remind me
> >>>>>>> of windows are as follows.
> >>>>>>> 1. automatic reading of a webpage.
> >>>>>>> 2. voice over hints. I know what to do in a text area,
> >>>>>>> especially
> >>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>> it already says edit text.
> >>>>>>> 3. insertion point. this has been discussed, it's counter
> >>> intuitive
> >>>>>>> and doesn't teach the vi community how it would look to
> >>>>>>> sighties.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> all I can say is I'm so glad these features are optional. they
> >>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>> just horrific and no one can tell me that it will help
> >>>>>>> progression
> >>>>>>> from windows to mac. I didn't have these features and I am so
> >>>>>>> glad I
> >>>>>>> did. mac is not windows, when will people realise this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> overall vo rocks even more in this version, and I am grateful
> to
> >>>>>>> apple
> >>>>>>> for giving us a choice. really glad.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >>> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.71/2333 - Release Date:
> >>> 08/29/09 17:51:00
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >
> >
> > >
> 
> 
> > 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.71/2335 - Release Date:
> 08/30/09 06:36:00


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to