I, on the other hand, much appreciate the later Mac OS as it becomes more iOS 
like.

David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
Sent from my iPhone

> On 27 Jul 2014, at 4:27, Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> If your Mac journey starts with Lion, then I'd agree that anything subsequent 
> is a vast improvement.  Of the three released since Lion, I think ML has 
> proven to be the least annoying and most stable, but Mavericks will probably 
> prove less frustrating at the current rate of VoiceOver instability and 
> Safari crashes.
> 
> I don't agree that OS X is substantially better since SL, in fact, I'd argue 
> that many things now taken for granted started their life in SL.  This 
> includes the many VoiceOver changes since Leopard, which IMO were among the 
> biggest.  FWIW, my first Mac came with Leopard, although I wasn't much 
> impressed by Tiger before it, and didn't even know Apple had a Spoken 
> Interface preview before then.  I had some dealings with classic Mac OS, but 
> only through a musical friend downgrading for the use of Outspoken from 
> Panther.
> 
> The Windows comparison is highly strained, because indeed, Windows 7--still 
> used by many people--was released in the same year as SL.  I realise the 
> power of nostalgia, but Apple's release cycle is much shorter than 
> Microsoft's, and there are still people using SL because they have to, EG 
> those with Core Solo Macs.  So, yes, SL is to Apple what XP is to Windows, 
> but only because it's discontinued and many people have, use, need and enjoy 
> it.
> 
> I don't think I could go back to SL.  I might install it, and use it, between 
> now and Yosemite, as a kind of personal protest.  Sadly, some of the tools I 
> use (in particular OS X server's caching server and Arq) require later 
> versions of OS X.  Still, I do maintain that SL was, subjectively at any 
> rate, the best version of OS X I've used--better than Leopard 10.5.8, Lion, 
> Mountain Lion, and Mavericks.  The latter three, in my opinion, are 
> destroying the platform, rendering it less and less "Mac-like" and more and 
> more "iPad-like", which is not a trend I appreciate at all.  As soon as 
> "Windows 9" (or whatever they call it) comes out and proves to be everything 
> that's likeable about Windows 7, but with all of the under-the-hood goodness 
> in Windows 8, I'll take a serious look.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sabahattin
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to