Hi Shawn,

Thanks for your input. 

Sometimes it's good to see where this corporate behaviour is going. Are you 
hitting the spot completely? Am I right? Who cares? Essentially there's an 
interest, and there is creating the environment to facilitate the idea.


Yuma Antoine Decaux
"Light has no value without darkness"
Mob: +612102277190
Skype: Shainobi1
twitter: http://www.twitter.com/triple7




> On 6/01/2015, at 8:10 pm, Sean Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> I have to go against the grain. If you think Apple or any other vendor is 
> going to spend time on building a non-graphical environment as outlined on 
> this thread. It will not occur due to no market.  We are .5% of the market 
> thus there is no business requirement for them and they will not get their 
> ROI.
> 
> The CLI on the Mac does provide text base applications if you like to learn. 
> people like things to be easy, thus why we have GUI now.
> 
> Sean 
> On 3 Jan 2015, at 5:19 am, Yuma Antoine Decaux <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Where and when is the nFB? I heard a few conflicting ideas about the 
>> organisation. But I would take the momentum to engage the voice.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Yuma Antoine Decaux
>> "Light has no value without darkness"
>> Mob: +612102277190
>> Skype: Shainobi1
>> twitter: http://www.twitter.com/triple7 <http://www.twitter.com/triple7>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 2/01/2015, at 12:59 pm, Joanne Chua <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> What about if we start asking Apple to make some products that is
>>> specificly for voiceover, and don't worry about GPU at all hey? Won't
>>> it be great? Maybe, someone might want to bring this up on this year
>>> NFB convention?
>>> 
>>> On 02/01/2015, Yuma Antoine Decaux <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> What I'm trying to induce here is the sense that no matter the graphic
>>>> outline, everything starts graphicsless and elements are pulled out of the
>>>> lower layers, such as kernel, login daemons etc. The graphics layer itself
>>>> cannot be omitted since it is also the core of a lot of coco frameworks
>>>> which voice over relies on.
>>>> 
>>>> However, when I say graphcsless, I mean to place to a minimum all of the
>>>> animations and flash and graphics that appear. I would easily visualise a 
>>>> UI
>>>> which borders, buttons and everything else are just placeholders with plain
>>>> black and borders that don't load images. No background image, no 
>>>> transition
>>>> animations, no stupid bouncing apps that go "hey I'm here" etc etc. This 
>>>> can
>>>> free up ressources and reserve them for voice over itself.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yuma Antoine Decaux
>>>> "Light has no value without darkness"
>>>> Mob: +612102277190
>>>> Skype: Shainobi1
>>>> twitter: http://www.twitter.com/triple7 <http://www.twitter.com/triple7>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2/01/2015, at 10:03 am, Jason White <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> BobH. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> I think a lot of us have said for a good while, that modern 'puters are
>>>>>> 99%
>>>>>> eye candy or effects;  and maybe as much as 1% real work, though doubt
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> DOS worked so well, cos it did none of that.  Boring to the sighted, but
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> even they were more focussed on getting real info in or out and not just
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> there to play with it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So, yes,  a cutToTheQwik system  that took us back to doing the stuff
>>>>>> we're
>>>>>> doing, without all the other overhead, would have some use; can think of
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> professional areas where it would be saleable for it's simplicity;  but
>>>>>> doubt it's going to happen.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's already happening. If you work primarily from the Linux console
>>>>> (just
>>>>> using the GUI for tasks that require it, e.g., Web browsing), you
>>>>> essentially
>>>>> have what you've described.
>>>>> 
>>>>> this can't be done in the same way under OS X, which always loads a
>>>>> graphical
>>>>> desktop environment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm writing this message from a Linux virtual terminal.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So far as the two operating systems are concerned, there are some
>>>>> applications
>>>>> for which I like to use OS X, but it's my Linux laptop that I'm using
>>>>> most
>>>>> often at home just now, even though the Macbook is newer.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>>>> email to [email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries 
>>>>> <http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries>.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>>> email to [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries 
>>>> <http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries>.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries 
>>> <http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries 
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries 
> <http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to