Inline responses.

On 11 Apr 2015, at 00:41, Barry Hadder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Come on, guys. It’s a small device that you can wear on the wrist. Don’t you 
>> see any potential there at all? The remote control you’ve always wanted?
>> 
> Doesn’t a new remote control  interfere with the narrative that people are 
> sitting too much?

Almost certainly, but I’m confident that won’t make a dent in that use case.  
Apple is supporting Apple TV remote; perhaps they’ll support iTunes as well, 
then I can put on the cordless headphones and remote completely mobile, whether 
making tea or in bed.  Wow, that would be nice! :)

>> The around-the-house communications device for the friends and family while 
>> your phone is docked and not weighing you down? Even the need for an iPhone 
>> is not so much of a deal, if the watch proves useful outdoors, because any 
>> place that you would go already sees you needing the phone for phone 
>> functions, regardless; your watch will always tether to a local phone, 
>> wherever you happen to be.
>> 
> So, we are supposed to want to buy a new iPhone, but we aren’t supposed to 
> want to have to touch it.  We need to git a watch so we don’t actually have 
> to directly use our new iPhones.  I still am finding their messaging 
> confusing..

Well, sort of.  My point is more that you might not mind the inconvenience of 
shouldering the phone when using the watch makes it so much easier.  Indeed, 
you might not even realise it’s happening at all.  The clever part is that your 
phone is always essential; you’ll always have it, and there will never be any 
question of excess load; the watch will just be better at some things than your 
phone is.  And remember, it’s Wi-Fi—your phone could also be the hotspot about 
the place, or as will be commonplace, on the home Wi-Fi with your watch.  
Essentially, your iPhone just moves a rung down the ladder, just as your 
computer often does today, with respect to the ever-present phone, for the 
easiest of tasks.  The real question now is simply how long it will take before 
the phone is no longer required (or is required, but can be synchronised to 
your watch by means of the cloud, or whatever) so you no longer need the 
proximity and thus the inconvenience of carrying the phone.  It may indeed be 
never, and that may very well not be a problem.

>> So I preordered. I’ll take the leap. Why not? It might just be my 
>> imagination, but even now I have more fondness for my iPods than my iPhone 
>> as a music player—what’s to say the watch won’t make some of the things that 
>> are made clumsy by the need to pull out my phone and that I do all the time 
>> more enjoyable?
>> 
> You don’t want to have to handle your new iPhone.
> Actually, I think that there are applications that a wearable  would make  
> easier to use.  But, I think those applications are limited. 

I don’t even want to be burdened with the thought of my iPhone.  Am I asking 
too much?  Very probably.

>> , yes, I do think something has changed in the way Apple prioritises things; 
>> this product seems far more strained, for lack of a better word, and that 
>> may well be the result of executive decision-making that tends towards 
>> company growth rather than user satisfaction. 
>> 
> It looks to me like Apple trying to emulate Google.

Oh, I dunno really.  Wearables were always going to be the next frontier.  I 
mean, let’s be completely honest for a second: this discussion comes down to 
asking what you can do with a device that just happens to be small enough to 
sit on your wrist.  Forget all the Apple vs everyone politics, the character 
assassinations of various key execs, the market strategy, the pricing, the 
network effects on smartphones—the question is simply, “What are the 
possibilities for a smart watch?”  It would be impossible for Apple not to 
concede the development of smart watches, even if it hadn’t been investigating 
them for (as is now widely reported) strictly health purposes.  It’s certainly 
frustrating that, in a fast-paced technology landscape, Apple increasingly 
prefers to emerge victorious regardless of the needs of customers, even if that 
means starting late and squeezing hard for every last drop of profit from the 
Apple experience, but I don’t think that’s at all unusual for Apple.  As usual 
the early adopters will be along to tell us how right (or wrong) we were about 
Apple’s approach, but in the end the market will push Apple closer and closer 
to the mark, just as with Android on phones.  I have no doubt the convergence 
will benefit everybody, including Apple users.

>> Well, anyway, I’m especially looking forward to handling incoming 
>> notifications while I’m on the toilet. :)
> 
> Wow!  Now I’m listening.

Yes, I really must get around to setting up Touch ID on the other hand, as my 
current choice of finger is somewhat unfortunate. :)

No, seriously, my biggest fear right now is all the apps that I don’t want 
pestering me all the time.  I enjoy peace and quiet, and I’m going to prep 
things so my watch only tells me about the important stuff.  That way I won’t 
“Forget” about things I was sure I’d get around to later, or never see the 
notification at all in the flood that would be listed on the phone lock screen. 
 So if I can arrange things—probably just by removing all the apps—so that my 
watch connects me more to the things I really care about, then I could really 
come to like being tapped on the wrist.  Besides which I suppose there is a 
much bigger danger of simply never being able to disconnect, which is quite 
frightening I suppose; the watch would make that even more inescapable.  
Therefore while I think notification responses are a terrific idea, it will 
have to be very carefully managed.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to