Like others on list I've played around with the solution that brings the Eloquence TTS to the Mac.

As pointed out it's horribly unstable.

If Apple can figure out a way of incorporating Eloquence in the next version of OS X I'd certainly be interested.

Alex has a very hard time announcing some names in Arabic and Somali my native languages.

Hope the Siri voices available in iOS 9 make  it into VoiceOver.

To be honest a lot of those voices need to go.

Not a lot has changed in terms of TTS since I got the Mac way back in 2010.

Sadam Ahmed

On 6/12/2015 6:32 AM, Tim Kilburn wrote:
Hi,

I agree with Shawn.  I've not been a fan of Eloquence ever primarily due to how 
it sounds.  But, to each their own.

Later...

Tim Kilburn
Fort McMurray, AB Canada

On Jun 11, 2015, at 14:11, Shawn Krasniuk <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi. The thing I have against Eloquence and even ESpeak is because they are too 
robotic sounding. Actually, one of the reasons why I moved to the Mac back in 
2010 is because of Alex. When a friend of mine showed me how he took breaths 
when he reads and when watching Youtube videos with him on them, I was 
impressed with the way he sounded. Bottom line is, I moved to the Mac to get 
away from all robotic voices. Now I'm using Sharon from Acapela who I think is 
the best US English voice they made. In my opinion, like it or not, human 
natural voices are the future for us so I don't think Eloquence or eSpeak will 
ever come on to the Mac, especially if what that other poster said is true that 
Eloquence is discontinued.

Shawn
Sent from my White MacBook



On Jun 11, 2015, at 2:25 PM, Christopher-Mark Gilland <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Jonathan,

I totally totally agree with you!  If we could get Eloquence on the mac, that 
would probably be the happiest day of my life!  I am one of those who falls 
into the category you mentioned regarding Alex.  I can use him, but I have to 
keep it at the default speaking rate, and even then, with my hearing loss, I 
have to pay fairly close attention.  Especially if I'm reading say, an entire 
paragraph or whatever in one chunk.  Again, I can do it, but it's not easy.

I don't honestly know what so many people have against Eloquence.  Even the 
Vocalizer voices I can't seem to really understand terribly well.  I can do it, 
as I said, but not easily.  I can't ramp Eloquence up very fast, but I 
definitely have it slightly faster than the default both on my JAWS and my 
Window-eyes.

I know that Eloquence is also available for NVDA, but not legally, so there 
went that idea.

I know there is a port for Eloquence done by Tylor Spivy of Eloquence that 
works on the mac, but it's a bit tricky to get it working, and is incredibly 
incredibly unstable.  I used it just long enough to see if it really actually 
worked, but obviously took it off, 1, when I saw how unstable it was, and 2, 
due to the fact it's also illegal.  Even had it worked flawlessly, I couldn't 
have kept it in good concience.

I agree though, if there was a way to buy a mac ported stable mind you, license 
for Eloquence, for OSX, I'd do it faster than a blink of an eye! Darn straight 
I would!  It's really about the only synth I can not only understand, but 
comfortably can listen to on and on for hours at a time.

Chris.

----- Original Message ----- From: "'Kevin Cussick' via MacVisionaries" 
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: time for Apple to get a new default voice


Well I use Fiona Compact and have it as fast as I can and love it. but
each to there own.

On 10/06/2015 20:16, Jonathan Mosen wrote:
Hi Christopher. I think it depends on the hearing loss. I've worked with people 
for example with a hearing loss who find Alex unintelligible once you go a 
little above the default rate, but who can have compact Daniel cranked up 
remarkably fast.
Personally I'd be delighted to have Eloquence on my Mac because Alex 
mispronounces far too much for my liking. The moral of the story is the more 
choice of TTS a screen reader company can offer, the better. Speech is 
extremely subjective.
Jonathan Mosen
Mosen Consulting
Blindness technology eBooks, tutorials and training
http://Mosen.org

On 11/06/2015, at 6:28 am, christopher hallsworth <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Might be coming next year <grin>. Seriously though, I don't ever want Apple to 
remove Alex. He's fantastic for someone with moderately severe to profound hearing 
loss which I have. The other voices included are fine, but doesn't cut it like Alex.
On 10 Jun 2015, at 18:46, Shawn Krasniuk <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Ray. I don't really want Apple to get rid of Alex. I lve the fact that he 
takes breaths and everything. I am with you on one thing though, I hope Apple 
considers making the Siri voices available in El Capitan. After all, you can 
get them for NVDA in Windows so why can't it be done on the Mac?

Shawn
Sent from my White MacBook



On Jun 10, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Ray Foret Jr <[email protected]> wrote:

Subject line pretty much says it all.  Nothing against Alex mind you: but, 
frankly, I reckon it's high time Apple adopted a new and much more updated 
default voice.  The new Siri male US English voice might perhaps be a good 
choice.  Here's hoping we see this one in Elcapitan.


Sincerely,
The Constantly Barefooted Ray

Still a happy Mac, Verizon Wireless iPhone 6+ and Apple TV user!

Sent from my Mac,
the only computer with full accessibility for the blind built-in


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to