Scott I could not agree more. If these carriers did not know what they were getting into, that is not Apple's fault and believe me they knew there is no question about that. THey are just looking for handouts. And for those who want to continue to argue in favor for the carriers, the carriers could simply stop carrying the iPHone and then they can cry about the subscribers they would not continue to attract. Scott
On Dec 9, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Scott Granados wrote: > But you're wrong here, Apple Google and the others already to "invest" in > these companies. They pay their Internet bills. Sure Google has a huge > infrastructure and does a lot of settlement free traffic exchanging but they > buy a ton of pipes, transport, facilities, buildings, on and on and they do > buy transit so pay per packet for traffic not directly connected. Same with > Apple and the other companies you mention. Apple pays Internap per megabit > just like everyone else does. It's not Apple's job to pay some European > carrier because they can't manage their own infrastructure. It's like saying > I should have to pay Cox Cable money because I use a lot of service from > Comcast. That's just silly. > > > On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Ruud Bemelmans wrote: > >> I don't think this is such a bad idea, because it keeps reinforcing the >> industry. If Apple, google and other companies that produce smart phones >> want to keep up the current success of said phones, then investing in the >> networks will eventually result in an even bigger success rates. If the >> carriers can't maintain the network, the sale of smart phones will dwindle >> and the carriers as well as the smart phone producers will have a bad time >> all around. The big question however is, if this goes through, how much >> extra costs will that generate for the customers? But to be fair, that's >> always the question with changes in various industries. >> >> On a short of-topic note: I didn't think the few politics-related messages >> were relevant to the subject as politics didn't get mentioned anywhere in >> the article or in the on-topic replies. I'm just mentioning this as this is >> an international list with god knows how many people from various >> backgrounds and politics is one of those subjects that always causes trouble >> in such a varied group. (just my opinion) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
