Well said John.  glad to see you post again.

Have a good one.

Later...

On 2011-02-07, at 11:58 AM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

> Thankfully this was done and perhaps the person who did the last video will 
> do a little more research next time around before doing a Podcast and if he 
> does then perhaps his work will shine in a favourable light <smile>.
> 
> 
> On 08/02/2011, at 5:54 AM, John Panarese wrote:
> 
>>    The other part of it is when one does put out a podcast or an article 
>> that clearly rings of lack of knowledge, it not only discredits the 
>> author/authors, but, as in the case of the AFB when VoiceOver was released, 
>> it reflects on the publication itself.  People naturally assume that there 
>> is a "secret agenda" or some kind of ulterior motive behind the review or 
>> comparison.  Whether it was intended or not, if you demonstrate a lack of 
>> knowledge or make assumptions that prove to be easily shown inaccurate, your 
>> work is diminished and your "reputation" takes the hit.  Unfortunately, 
>> because just about anyone can do a podcast or write a blog, there is no real 
>> means of certification or method of knowing who actually understands what 
>> they are reviewing or comparing.  Thus, it's up to the community to "make 
>> examples" of such inaccuracies and reveal them for the falsehoods they are.
>> 
>> Take Care
>> John Panarese
>> 
>> On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
>> 
>>> Howdy John and good to see you firmly in the saddle <smile>.
>>> 
>>> Your points as per usual are well made but even worse than that are those 
>>> people who compare let's say apples and oranges however they don't know 
>>> everything about the fruit they're comparing but think they do if you get 
>>> my drift <smile>.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 08/02/2011, at 5:36 AM, John Panarese wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Honestly, this is really common sense advice for using any product you 
>>>> intend on comparing or reviewing in a podcast.  I find it completely 
>>>> unprofessional and disgraceful when someone attempts to review or compare 
>>>> products when they clearly have no lengthy familiarity or knowledge of 
>>>> what they are reviewing or comparing.  It just makes no sense.  If you 
>>>> don't know how to use something, how do you sit there and say it can't do 
>>>> something that can be done with another product you are far more familiar 
>>>> with.  You do yourself and the community as a whole a complete disservice. 
>>>>  Whether it's Mac and Windows, Windows screen readers, Braille Notetakers 
>>>> or anything else,  Know Your Products before you Review or Compare them.
>>>> 
>>>> Take Care
>>>> John Panarese
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 7, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Jes Smith wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I bought my Mac in 2009, and while I still use Windows for three specific 
>>>>> functions that are not accesible on the MAc, I will give anyone who wants 
>>>>> to do podcasts comparing v o to Jaws or any other Windows screen reader a 
>>>>> word of advice. Give yourself at least two months with the Mac and voice 
>>>>> over. Abandon Windows. Unplug all your Windows boxes, and force yourself 
>>>>> to do things the Mac way. Then, do your podcasts. Or, MAybe after your 
>>>>> two month honey moon with the Mac and v o, then, there will be no need to 
>>>>> do them in the first place.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jes
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

Tim Kilburn
Fort McMurray, AB Canada

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to