I am sure you did not mean for your message to sound as agressive and 
patronising as it did, so I am just going to pretend I did not see it.
Naama
On 25 Jun 2011, at 20:33, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:

> Naama,
> 
> so you are advocating more RAM to a basic user with minimal requirements, on 
> the bases that your usage benefited from an increase in RAM, when by your own 
> statement, your usage is not normal or minimal. you are doing a lot with 
> audio, this is not a usual usage pattern, granted the Mac is easily capable 
> of it, but I doubt that most users are doing what you are.
> 
> the key to the response for the person originally asking, is what they're 
> needs are, they've not mentioned audio editing etc. thus we as responsible 
> respondents should not be bringing that aspect into the mix, it just serves 
> to confuse.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Neil Barnfather
> 
> Talks List Administrator
> Twitter @neilbarnfather
> 
> TalkNav is a Nuance, Code Factory and Sendero dealer, for all your
> accessible phone, PDA and GPS related enquiries visit www.talknav.com
> 
> URL: - www.talknav.com
> e-mail: - [email protected]
> Phone: - +44  844 999 4199
> 
> 
> 
> On 25 Jun 2011, at 17:39, Naama Shang wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> I do quite a bit on my machine, especially in audio. I am learning the macand 
> plan to do all my audio work on it.
> Naama
> On 25 Jun 2011, at 19:28, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:
> 
>> Naama,
>> 
>> you say you upgraded your iMac, and you are pleased with the results, how 
>> much did you have in the past, what speed of RAM, which Mac do you have, 
>> what bus speed, what processor, how fast was the spin speed on your hard 
>> drive, what cache level etc.
>> 
>> you are implying that the pure RAM improvement made this difference, but the 
>> implication is that you had a perfect machine and that the RAM slowed things 
>> down, you may have had a lesser machine, and the RAM made things better for 
>> you.
>> 
>> I'm not saying that you did not notice a benefit, but I'm saying that you 
>> likely would have noted one no matter what component you upgraded.
>> 
>> what I am saying is that on a 2010 or even 2009 model Mac, with a good 
>> specification all round, the difference in performance from 4Gb RAM to 
>> anything above, will not be noticed by the average user whatsoever.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Neil Barnfather
>> 
>> Talks List Administrator
>> Twitter @neilbarnfather
>> 
>> TalkNav is a Nuance, Code Factory and Sendero dealer, for all your
>> accessible phone, PDA and GPS related enquiries visit www.talknav.com
>> 
>> URL: - www.talknav.com
>> e-mail: - [email protected]
>> Phone: - +44  844 999 4199
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 13:58, Naama Shang wrote:
>> 
>> I upgraded my iMac to 8gigs of ram and I am not sorry in the learst.
>> Ram, compared to other things,is relatively inexpensive, and the results are 
>> well worth it.
>> Naama
>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:48, CJ Daniel wrote:
>> 
>>> Kliff,
>>> 
>>> I was a programmer for years, starting back in the mid-80's.  I got my 
>>> first PC in, about, '90 or '91, when we were all using DOS 3.5.  I've gone 
>>> through all the successions.  I.E. various versions of DOS, Windows 3.1, 
>>> '95, '98 SE, ME, XP, Vista & now Apple Mac.  I suppose there can come a 
>>> time when a user is buying more memory than they really need.  But, through 
>>> out all of those experiences, the rule-of-thumb where memory was concerned, 
>>> especially for those users who were adding the huge overhead of screen 
>>> reading technology, was, "the more the merrier."  In fact, my understanding 
>>> for the new OS upgrade called Lion is that you need @ least 2GB to run it.  
>>> I'm looking @ upgrading my 2 Gigs to as much as Little Mama will hold.  My 
>>> advice is, shove as much as you can in there & just enjoy the results.
>>> 
>>> CJ
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Kliph&Sharrie wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Okay, I am still on a few windows screen readers lists, since I teach a 
>>>> few basic classes about JFW and know a lot about the windows side of 
>>>> things.  Anyways, someone said on this list that the average blind user 
>>>> needs no more than 4 gigs of ram, at best anything over 8 would be a 
>>>> waste.  I'm no exburt, but I have done a little research, and googling and 
>>>> have found that the more  ram you have, the smoother your system will run, 
>>>> mac or PC.  This person seem to think even if you had a fast processor, 
>>>> that spending money on ram was a waste.  Now I will admitt, that apple is 
>>>> a little pricy when it comes to ram, but there are third party sellers out 
>>>> there with compatable memory for just about any system.  Thoughts?  Oh, 1 
>>>> more thing this person said, that the only way more than 4 gigs would be 
>>>> necessary is if you were doing some high quality video or audio editting.  
>>>> What do you all think or know about these numbers and comments?
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from Minister Miller's IPhone
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to