Everyone has an opinion?  Isn't that what you asked for?  Grin  

Since you say you already know what you want, then don't keep us in this awful 
& lingering suspense.  Please share &  put us out of our email flying, dander 
rising misery.

CJ

On Jun 25, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Kliph&Sharrie wrote:

> Actually, I was asking for an opinion, on how much an average blind user may 
> use on a day to day basis, since there were conflicting statements on other 
> lists that I'm on.  It's not going to move me either way since I know what I 
> want.  Everyone has an opinion.
> Kliphton SR
> (twitter) http://twitter.com/kliphton72
> (Marriage Blog) http://cm-i-t-real-world.blogspot.com
> (Google Voice) 657-229-2105
> Sent from my IMac
> 
> On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:
> 
>> Naama,
>> 
>> indeed, I did not wish it to sound patronising or aggressive, and re-reading 
>> it, I do not believe it does, and I am sorry if you think it does,
>> 
>> but I stand by what I'm saying here. the original author of the question 
>> asked, and its in the subject line of the message, how much RAM does the 
>> average  user need.
>> 
>> the average user is not audio editing and other things that you are, thus 
>> your answer, in my view and opinion, serves to muddy and confuse the 
>> watrees. bringing into the picture that you benefited from a RAM increase, 
>> and do not regret it, makes the original author think, oh, maybe I will, 
>> which is why I followed up your original post, by asking you why you did it, 
>> what your machine spec was, and what you used it for.
>> 
>> the answer showed me you were not a typical or average user, thus your 
>> response should have been constructed in that way...
>> 
>> i.e. to say that you, as a person who uses their Mac for Audio editing, 
>> found the increase in RAM to be of benefit, but that for an average user you 
>> feel or would expect x, or that for an average user you do not know.
>> 
>> all of my messages I backup with sound practice and experience, I qualify 
>> why I am saying what I am saying and on what bases and understanding, this 
>> gives the reader the opportunity to assess the validity of my response.
>> 
>> I hope that this clears up my message and my reason for being a little 
>> negative, which I accept I was, but for a reason.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Neil Barnfather
>> 
>> Talks List Administrator
>> Twitter @neilbarnfather
>> 
>> TalkNav is a Nuance, Code Factory and Sendero dealer, for all your
>> accessible phone, PDA and GPS related enquiries visit www.talknav.com
>> 
>> URL: - www.talknav.com
>> e-mail: - [email protected]
>> Phone: - +44  844 999 4199
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 19:10, Naama Shang wrote:
>> 
>> I am sure you did not mean for your message to sound as aggressive and 
>> patronising as it did, so I am just going to pretend I did not see it.
>> Naama
>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 20:33, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:
>> 
>>> Naama,
>>> 
>>> so you are advocating more RAM to a basic user with minimal requirements, 
>>> on the bases that your usage benefited from an increase in RAM, when by 
>>> your own statement, your usage is not normal or minimal. you are doing a 
>>> lot with audio, this is not a usual usage pattern, granted the Mac is 
>>> easily capable of it, but I doubt that most users are doing what you are.
>>> 
>>> the key to the response for the person originally asking, is what they're 
>>> needs are, they've not mentioned audio editing etc. thus we as responsible 
>>> respondents should not be bringing that aspect into the mix, it just serves 
>>> to confuse.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Neil Barnfather
>>> 
>>> Talks List Administrator
>>> Twitter @neilbarnfather
>>> 
>>> TalkNav is a Nuance, Code Factory and Sendero dealer, for all your
>>> accessible phone, PDA and GPS related enquiries visit www.talknav.com
>>> 
>>> URL: - www.talknav.com
>>> e-mail: - [email protected]
>>> Phone: - +44  844 999 4199
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 17:39, Naama Shang wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> I do quite a bit on my machine, especially in audio. I am learning the 
>>> machined plan to do all my audio work on it.
>>> Naama
>>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 19:28, Neil Barnfather - TalkNav wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Naama,
>>>> 
>>>> you say you upgraded your iMac, and you are pleased with the results, how 
>>>> much did you have in the past, what speed of RAM, which Mac do you have, 
>>>> what bus speed, what processor, how fast was the spin speed on your hard 
>>>> drive, what cache level etc.
>>>> 
>>>> you are implying that the pure RAM improvement made this difference, but 
>>>> the implication is that you had a perfect machine and that the RAM slowed 
>>>> things down, you may have had a lesser machine, and the RAM made things 
>>>> better for you.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not saying that you did not notice a benefit, but I'm saying that you 
>>>> likely would have noted one no matter what component you upgraded.
>>>> 
>>>> what I am saying is that on a 2010 or even 2009 model Mac, with a good 
>>>> specification all round, the difference in performance from 4Gb RAM to 
>>>> anything above, will not be noticed by the average user whatsoever.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Neil Barnfather
>>>> 
>>>> Talks List Administrator
>>>> Twitter @neilbarnfather
>>>> 
>>>> TalkNav is a Nuance, Code Factory and Sendero dealer, for all your
>>>> accessible phone, PDA and GPS related enquiries visit www.talknav.com
>>>> 
>>>> URL: - www.talknav.com
>>>> e-mail: - [email protected]
>>>> Phone: - +44  844 999 4199
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 13:58, Naama Shang wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I upgraded my iMac to 8gigs of ram and I am not sorry in the least.
>>>> Ram, compared to other things,is relatively inexpensive, and the results 
>>>> are well worth it.
>>>> Naama
>>>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:48, CJ Daniel wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Kliff,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was a programmer for years, starting back in the mid-80's.  I got my 
>>>>> first PC in, about, '90 or '91, when we were all using DOS 3.5.  I've 
>>>>> gone through all the successions.  I.E. various versions of DOS, Windows 
>>>>> 3.1, '95, '98 SE, ME, XP, Vista & now Apple Mac.  I suppose there can 
>>>>> come a time when a user is buying more memory than they really need.  
>>>>> But, through out all of those experiences, the rule-of-thumb where memory 
>>>>> was concerned, especially for those users who were adding the huge 
>>>>> overhead of screen reading technology, was, "the more the merrier."  In 
>>>>> fact, my understanding for the new OS upgrade called Lion is that you 
>>>>> need @ least 2GB to run it.  I'm looking @ upgrading my 2 Gigs to as much 
>>>>> as Little Mama will hold.  My advice is, shove as much as you can in 
>>>>> there & just enjoy the results.
>>>>> 
>>>>> CJ
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Kliph&Sharrie wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Okay, I am still on a few windows screen readers lists, since I teach a 
>>>>>> few basic classes about JFW and know a lot about the windows side of 
>>>>>> things.  Anyways, someone said on this list that the average blind user 
>>>>>> needs no more than 4 gigs of ram, at best anything over 8 would be a 
>>>>>> waste.  I'm no exburt, but I have done a little research, and googling 
>>>>>> and have found that the more  ram you have, the smoother your system 
>>>>>> will run, mac or PC.  This person seem to think even if you had a fast 
>>>>>> processor, that spending money on ram was a waste.  Now I will admitt, 
>>>>>> that apple is a little pricy when it comes to ram, but there are third 
>>>>>> party sellers out there with compatible memory for just about any 
>>>>>> system.  Thoughts?  Oh, 1 more thing this person said, that the only way 
>>>>>> more than 4 gigs would be necessary is if you were doing some high 
>>>>>> quality video or audio editing.  What do you all think or know about 
>>>>>> these numbers and comments?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from Minister Miller's IPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to