On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:15, Henrik Hedberg <henrik.hedb...@innologies.fi> wrote: > > It seems that the overhead of using UnionFS is about 10% [1], which > should be noted when making decisions. This performance lost will affect > all files, not should "optified files" as in the original plan.
The article in question *is* five years old, and I believe the preferred union FS solution wouldn't be UnionFS, it'd possibly be aufs or one of the others explored by Valerie. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council chair _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
