On Dec 18, 2007 10:22 AM, Igor Stoppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 10:19 +0100, ext Frédéric Crozat wrote: > > On Dec 18, 2007 8:54 AM, Igor Stoppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 09:51 +0200, ext Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 20:56 -0800, ext Joshua Layne wrote: > > > > > they have had warranty issues on it. However, a brief search on > > > > > google > > > > > shows some fly-by-night places that have it for really cheap (like a > > > > > few > > > > > dollars), so I may just pick up a replacement and a spare for the > > > > > office./; > > > > > > > > Beware that some of the cheap noname ones might have different voltages > > > > - one of my 12V car chargers for example does not charge my N800 at all. > > > > It charges 770's and phones just fine. > > > > > > That's weird - N800 and 770 have practically the same chargin interface > > > - HW, SW and battery - and when doing idle chargin their current is > > > comparable. > > > > > > Unless the N800 sw recognises the fake charger and simply refuses to use > > > it :-) > > > > I object :) > > > > With my 770, I could use my Nokia 6021 charger ACP-7E (with the plug > > adapter CA-44) nicely. Unfortunately, > > it is no longer possible with n800, probably because the output power > > of the charger is too low. > > > > A collegue is able to charge his n800 (and 770) with his 6230 charger > > (ACP-12E) and the adapter. > > It depends also on the sw version you are running on the tablet.
At the time I did the test, it was OS 2006 on 770 and 2007 on n800. > Different OS versions have different versions of charging sw. > > Anyway, it shouldn't fail silently, but show some message. Yes, there was an error (not very explanatory IIRC). But it renders my CA-44 adapter useless :( Sound like a regression for paying Nokia customers.. -- Frederic Crozat _______________________________________________ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
