Le vendredi 17 février 2012 à 16:20 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > Op vrijdag 17 februari 2012 15:15:37 schreef Michael Scherer: > [...] > > Because no one never documented exactly what is needed to be providing > > dm, or what it exactly mean. > > > > Does it mean to be one of the choice of the prefdm service ? > > Does it mean to be able to understand /etc/X11/wmsession.d/ ? > > Ant others need to be seen as dm ? Where would it have impact, in > > drakdm, somewhere ? > > > > Without enough formalism in the interaction of rpms, this is just gonna > > be a hack. People will add provides, will change stuff, without any > > consistency, and curiously, that later cause issues. > > ok, so you mean we need a documented wiki policy page regarding dm > elegibility?
Not elegibility, knowing what should be done on a package level to be able to be a alternative to the others packages providing 'dm'. Likewise, the same should be done for httpd, sendmail-command etc. -- Michael Scherer
