Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le vendredi 17 février 2012 à 16:20 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
Op vrijdag 17 februari 2012 15:15:37 schreef Michael Scherer:
[...]
Because no one never documented exactly what is needed to be providing
dm, or what it exactly mean.
Does it mean to be one of the choice of the prefdm service ?
Does it mean to be able to understand /etc/X11/wmsession.d/ ?
Ant others need to be seen as dm ? Where would it have impact, in
drakdm, somewhere ?
Without enough formalism in the interaction of rpms, this is just gonna
be a hack. People will add provides, will change stuff, without any
consistency, and curiously, that later cause issues.
ok, so you mean we need a documented wiki policy page regarding dm
elegibility?
Not elegibility, knowing what should be done on a package level to be
able to be a alternative to the others packages providing 'dm'.
Likewise, the same should be done for httpd, sendmail-command etc.
Exactly. Let's document all virtual provides.
--
André
