Op vrijdag 17 februari 2012 14:32:53 schreef Oliver Burger: > Am 17.02.2012 14:26, schrieb Païou: > > It could be due to the fact that xdm, who is also automatically > > installed, does not possess the property "dm" > > Well I don't think because kdm gets installed also, when gdm is > installed, which does provide dm. > > > See bug 4532. > > The question, why xdm does not provide dm I can't answer. Was there a > technical reason or was it only forgotten? > > Oliver
this is more about dependency and suggestion fulfilling in urpmi. this is exactly what could be handled better imho.
