At Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:58:26 +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > >> There are lots of missing options for logging. Why? > > > > Well, there's a lot of git-log(1) options, presumably they're missing > > since nobody's added them yet. > > My implementation has 17 options for `log'. Each option requires just > one trivial line of code. I think that Phil's implementation doesn't > require much more for reflecting git options.
I'll add them back in soon. > > Aside from functions needing docstrings what sort of help system do > > you have in mind? > > My implementation reserves the key `?' for entering a special mode that > displays the docstring of a command instead of executing it. That > feature is permanently advertised on the minibuffer. If the new > implementation has something similar, it is not obvious for the user. This will go back in soon too. Cheers, Phil
