Philip Jackson <[email protected]> writes: >> Key combinations like b V and b B are inconvenient, you have to >> press shift in between. > > I did that because B and V performed the same actions retrospectively > in the old code. Please do suggest alternatives and we decide on what > to go with.
Here's what I propose for the branches group: b b - checkout (most likely the most often used) b c - create b m - manage(r), or perhaps 'b v - view' would be more intuitive? b r - rename I also propose: f f - fetch "current" remote (that is, don't ask anything) f o - fetch other remote (ask) f a - fetch all I think these would bring the new interface very close to the speed of the old one. > Yea, it turns out I've broken amending altogether. I'll revert all of > the log stuff and think about it more carefully for a better > implementation later. Thanks. -- Hannu
