On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:36:53 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an established standard for trivial markup? > I was raised on BOLD, *emphasis*, and _underline_. > Mahogany supports *bold* and _italic_. > Mozilla apparently uses *bold*, /italic/, and _underline_. > I'd think supporters of plain text email would want to > agree on the semantics of trivial markup. Short of that, > I wonder if Mahogany shd mimic Mozilla, which appears to > follow a de facto standard? What does emacs use? I thought it's like Mahogany. So we are the standard, aren't we? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
