On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:09:34 +1000 (E. Australia Standard Time) Mark Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ML> On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:36:53 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ML> ML> > Is there an established standard for trivial markup? ML> > I was raised on BOLD, *emphasis*, and _underline_. ML> > Mahogany supports *bold* and _italic_. Yes, this was my understanding of what it meant... I do know that sometimes people use underscores for underlined text but it's definitely used for italics as well and I've only seen /this/ a couple of times. ML> > Mozilla apparently uses *bold*, /italic/, and _underline_. ML> > I'd think supporters of plain text email would want to ML> > agree on the semantics of trivial markup. Short of that, ML> > I wonder if Mahogany shd mimic Mozilla, which appears to ML> > follow a de facto standard? ML> ML> M is clearly wrong. An examination of textmarkup.cpp shows it is only ML> scanning for * and _ and doing bold and italics. That should be bold ML> and underline. It should also have / added for italics. Really not sure... Is there any sort of standard about this? Maybe use text/enriched conventions (there is an RFC about it at least)? Does anyone know more about this? Thanks, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-users
