As far as I'm concerned, we can probably do this in steps, as long as we stabilize before 0.3, so no pushing down for now.
-jake On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> wrote: > That's a good question. I was not going to push them down, but if > you/others believethat they should be pushed down at this point I'd be > happy to do so. > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This all makes sense, I'm just wondering about the fact that now in the > > top-level > > in o.a.m.math, we have Vector, Matrix, SparseVector, etc. from the > original > > Mahout > > linear algebra stuff. > > > > Should these not get pushed down into the math.matrix subdirectory > (except > > for > > the functions which go down into math.function)? > > > > I can see *not* pushing them down, because it completely intermingles our > > old > > code with the Colt stuff, but at some point, they're going to be > > intermingled, right? > > > > -jake > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> As far as the package structure is concerned, Benson proposed > >> something similar to the the following: > >> > >> o.a.m.matrix -> o.a.m.math > >> o.a.m.jet -> o.a.m.math.jet > >> > >> Things currently under o.a.m.matrix would retain their existing names, > >> with s/matrix/math, for example: > >> > >> o.a.m.math.bitvector > >> o.a.m.math.buffer > >> o.a.m.math.function > >> o.a.m.math.list > >> o.a.m.math.map > >> o.a.m.math.matrix > >> > >> The maven submodule would be changed from mahout-matrix to mahout-math > >> > >> As far as committing cleanup changes -- it is whatever is in the patch > >> to MAHOUT-222, which I have not reviewed Once 222 is committed I'll > >> submit the reorg patch and more cleanup can proceed from there. I'm > >> certainly open to alternatives as well, just trying to jump in where I > >> can help. > >> > >> Drew > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > So we're committing cleanup changes first, and then doing reorg, > right? > >> > > >> > I'm for o.a.m.math, but we need to decide on where stuff goes in > >> subpackages > >> > below that, and then where to put stuff as far as maven submodules > too. > >> > > >> > -jake > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> No worries Sean -- it is really great to have your attention on the > >> issue. > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > No it's my bad, I missed one word while reading that message too > fast > >> >> > and misunderstood. Sorry for over-eagerly jumping in, I'll stay out > of > >> >> > this. > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
