Hello all ,
       I have always personally believed that the "fourth freedom" ( compulsion 
[freedom?] to distribute the derivative )  is the
root cause of all issues pertaining to GPL.

Companies like RedHat,IBM and others who rely on GPLed code as a base for their 
infrastructure software 

might have motivation to give it back to the community as they are also 
benefiting from the base. In that way, 

GPL is doing a good social service by forcing these giants to give it back to 
the community. ( Debian project
itself is reaction to the prominence of RH )



What about small time development company  or  Individuals who use GPL code as 
their base. They
will have reluctance to give the derivative work free as it might hamper their 
competitive edge in the 

market. A corporation spends capital by contributing a developer or two to get  
mindshare of 

the free software enthusiasts and they are using Software base as a mechanism 
to speed up the 

time to Market. 


Most small time developers ( other than some occasional exceptions ) never 
bother to use GPL source
code as their base. It is like fear of taxation which prevents an individual to 
take additional consulting 

work on top of his job. ( I have seen this phenomena a lot )

Take the case of GNUCash. It is one of the best source code base available out 
there. If some one adds
some  India specific modules , they can sell it. Whenever , I have suggested 
people to use that 

as a platform , GPL license were found to be restrictive and constraining for 
them.

Most Individuals prefer OSS licenses and corporations (paradoxically ) use GPL. 
Those corporations 

use GPL as a deterent against their competitors. If you use GPL , your 
competitors are also forced to 

distribute the derivative.

All the people in the world  not willing to pay interest to Stallman's ego by 
subscribing to GPL. 

Have you ever wondered why we Indians are not part of  Free Software movement 
as contributors ? 

Even the people who advocate Free Software has got reluctance to share their 
work. So, they never
bother to make the first step.



regards
Praseed Pai



________________________________
From: Anish A <[email protected]>
To: "This List discusses GNU/Linux & GNU, GPL Software" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2011 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [ILUG-Cochin.org] Ruby ditches GPL in favour of BSDL





2011/11/8 Praveen A <[email protected]>

2011/11/8 Siju George <[email protected]>:
>
>> GPL acheives its ends true. only thing it is not free!
>
>GPL ensures freedom to every user and BSD gives freedom to developers
>(including freedom to deny freedom to their users).
>
>
Since, I believe that users should have the ultimate freedom, I use and support 
GNU GPL and I usually don't contribute to any non-copylefted software.

-- 
Regards,
Anish A

http://identi.ca/aneeshnl

സ്വാതന്ത്ര്യം തന്നെയമൃതം 
സ്വാതന്ത്ര്യം തന്നെ ജീവിതം
പാരതന്ത്ര്യം മാനികള്‍ക്ക് മൃതിയെക്കാള്‍ 
ഭയാനകം
- മഹാകവി കുമാരനാശാന്‍ 

 
_______________________________________________
Indian Libre User Group Cochin Mailing List
http://www.ilug-cochin.org/mailing-list/
http://mail.ilug-cochin.org/mailman/listinfo/mailinglist_ilug-cochin.org
#[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Indian Libre User Group Cochin Mailing List
http://www.ilug-cochin.org/mailing-list/
http://mail.ilug-cochin.org/mailman/listinfo/mailinglist_ilug-cochin.org
#[email protected]

Reply via email to