On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 22:40 +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > If that really is the FSF policy, then mailman can only call itself > "GNU mailman" if it complies with the FSF policy - this is the game > in the GNU project. Whether or not to enforce FSF policy in the > mailman project is up to the mailman maintainers (for which I don't > speak, either).
I think we're obliged to, as long as we call ourselves GNU Mailman. Note that this applies regardless of whether we coordinate translations through Rosetta or not. Sadly, I've been lax at enforcing this requirement, so the only thing that Rosetta adds is easier management and stricter enforcement of a policy we should have had all along. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailman-i18n mailing list Posts: [email protected] Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-i18n/archive%40mail-archive.com
