On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Hugo Slabbert <hslabb...@stargate.ca> wrote: > > They're welcome to run their own server at near-zero maintenance cost. > But, if that mode of operating the mail server results in other mail > systems being negatively impacted and the admins of those mail systems then > taking corrective action that causes delivery issues for the customer, > that's one of the consequences/implications of running your mail system on > the cheap (read "poorly/not managed"). >
I totally get that. When they got a virus, they ended up on every blacklist known to man. Here we are over a week later and they aren't on *any* blacklists and mail delivery is working properly. Except for Microsoft properties... :) > Please know that I'm not trying to pin this on you or say that you're > managing the system poorly; this is a consequence of the customer's choice > of how much (little) they want to spend on managing that system/service. I totally agree. -A
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
