I recall at a M3AAWG meeting about a year ago this idea did not have much enthusiasm.
One big issue will be dynamic values. For example, one IP might be allowed more connections than another based on other historical data (aka reputation). We also know that the published info on some of the postmaster pages is out of date, because nobody has a great benefit for updating that information. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Federico Santandrea < federico.santand...@diennea.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am working on a rough draft for a protocol meant to facilitate exchange > of deliverability information among ESPs and mailbox providers. > > This arose from the observation that providers who choose to publish a > description of what they consider to be an acceptable mail flow, do this > each in their own way (FAQs, postmaster pages, helpdesks) and one has to > keep track of everything everywhere. > > I thought I could ask here for relevant opinions before getting too deep > into it, as I don't want to elaborate on what could be a known or unknown > bad idea; this seemed a suitable initial discussion venue to me. > > The draft text can be found at: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-santandrea-mail-limits-00.txt > > Would this fill anyone else's needs and benefit the community? > Any feedback is appreciated. > > -- > Federico > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
