Maawg and similar evolved more or less as a reaction to too less actual spam 
mitigation and far too much cowboy filtering

So in time the large players have all evolved best practices if only to keep 
the number of customer tickets down, while some of the j random neckbeard 
hosting their own mail types are still in the “block all of China” stage.

So yes, large players will often play nice, and respond professionally to 
requests for remediating false positives.

--srs
________________________________
From: mailop <[email protected]> on behalf of Taavi Eomäe via mailop 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2026 5:34:17 AM
To: Marco Moock <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [mailop] Notes from kernel.org admin about *Continuous degradation 
of SMTP*

On 17.12.2025 22:35, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Hosting your own is a good thing against that.

I've found that to be worse in the context of kernel.org. Kernel.org
uses RBLs which contain larger IPv6 subnets than what are allocated to
customers, making delivery to kernel.org tedious by-default. I'd say
kernel.org is directly contributing to the degradation of SMTP.

I won't be changing providers just for them and some RBL trying to
dictate allocation like that is kinda silly in the first place.

On the other hand that same server has had no problems delivering to
Google or Yahoo. So the "big guys" are much nicer than kernel.org in my
personal experience. YMMV.


_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to