* Al Iverson via mailop: > If you modify the MLM to stop making changes to prevent DKIM failures > you're still going to have problems with SPF failures.
Hence my choice of subject: "DKIM", not "DKIM and SPF". ;-) > Given that Microsoft and Google require both SPF and DKIM pass for > bulk senders, that just shifts the pain, it doesn't eliminate it. I consider something to be better than nothing. The world still contains entities which hold that a DKIM pass is good enough. I also wonder if the mailop mailing list's server qualifies as a bulk sender. We may be legion, but the number of mail administrators slash ML subscribers is not all *that* high, is it? -Ralph _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
