Dagobert Michelsen wrote on 26.09.2009 10:59: > Am 25.09.2009 um 19:27 schrieb Philip Brown: > >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:36 PM, William Bonnet >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Proposition are listed in this poll : >>> >>> http://doodle.com/huc5w789f4gmft79 >>> >> i finally got around to looking at this... and seems like an option >> is missing. >> >> you were comparing what happens to something called "fooproto". >> >> you give "xfooxproto" as an option (which is very confusing to me, >> sticking something in the MIDDLE). But you dont have "xfooproto" as >> an option. > > William, Sebastian, Maciej: Why do you think it is a good idea to > reorder the naming parts of the software? Like > inputproto -> x11proto_input
Simply as a way to group them via a common prefix. But honestly, i don't mind having a shorter one either. We will hit the 20 chars limit with x11proto_ and that in turn will drag a whole other discussion with it. One that we need to have some time, but maybe not this time. Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
