On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Actually, I thought about suggesting compressing the prefix even more. >> We've got pm_* and py_*, right? If there's a whole category of X11 >> protocols, why not have xp_*? A counterargument could be that xp_* is >> not self explanatory. Well, neither is pm_*. > > It is, because the files end in .pm :-)
That's an excellent ignotum per ignotious right there! ;-) >> If anyone is interested >> in what those packages are (that xp stands for X11 protocol), >> descriptions will help. What do you think? > > The proposed solution from William with a simple prefix and leaving the > rest as defined by upstream sounds very reasonable to me. The x11_foo, where foo is an upstream name which might be ending in 'proto'? It sounds reasonable too, I just wanted to put the shortest possible option out there, so that it can get considered. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
