Hi William,
Am 27.09.2009 um 22:11 schrieb William Bonnet:
Simply as a way to group them via a common prefix. But honestly, i
don't
mind having a shorter one either.
We will hit the 20 chars limit with x11proto_ and that in turn will
drag
a whole other discussion with it. One that we need to have some time,
but maybe not this time.
So do we agree that :
For proto packages
We add a x11_ prefix to all proto files
We keep the name of the package unchanged after the prefix
Proto packages that are not named like fooproto, are also unchanged
and prefix by x11_
Devel suffix will not be used for these files (even if the contains
the same kind of files as _devel packages)
Example : fooproto -> x11_fooproto
xbarproto -> x11_xbarproto
muf -> x11_muf
For X11/libs
We don't change anything
I have commited almost all the proto and libs that were pending on
my side. I still have a few options to add to be consistent with
Dago's modifications (i am thinking of some extra merge steps). But
before doing it i have to release and thus rename a few proto
packages.
This sounds like a good solution :-) Feel free to release any proto
you see
missing.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
