2011/2/13 Ben Walton <[email protected]>: > This is good. It doesn't force what the standard catalog name is, it > simply ensures that they match and tosses an error otherwise. This > makes a good deal of sense to me. Presumably there are other parts of > the code that look at things like 'devel' vs 'dev' etc?
The devel vs dev issue has been recently questioned[1] and not resolved. I planned to implement that check when the issue is resolved. The conversation started on pkgsubmissions, when I sent libffi packages for release, working towards resolution of the ctypes module problem in Python. The conversation has stalled. We've established that from the people who care about this issue, 4 are for -dev and 1 is for -devel. However, Phil hasn't acknowledged that fact and still hasn't released the libffi packages. I can't say I'm happy with issues being stalled like this. Maciej [1] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/2011-February/002185.html [2] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/2011-February/002190.html _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
