On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Am 15.02.2011 um 16:13 schrieb Philip Brown: >>... >> In contrast, there are 126 _devel packages that would have to be >> renamed the other way. >>... > > Personally I maintain 45 of these and all packages with devel stuff in it > needs to be touched anyway due to the library splitting.
"needs" is sort of overstating things. There is no urgency to it; things work as-is. And are you looking to take on the other 81 as well? :-} FYI, they are spread across 21 other maintainers. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
