2011/2/15 Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]>: >> Is there any new input? If no I suggest getting to a vote. >> (1) CSW*-dev *_dev >> (2) CSW*-devel *_devel >> While the current OpenCSW standard is (2) the solution (2) is short leaving >> more space for package names, is consistent with other packaging projects >> and without loss of meaning.
I'm currently setting up the vote on ballotbin. I don't know how much writeup from my side is expected. On one hand, I feel that the ballot should contain a reference or a writeup, but on the other hand, if I start writing it, my writeup will just get criticized and will never be good enough. I'm inclined to do no writeup whatsoever, and only include a link to this thread: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2011-February/014148.html Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
