On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:35:02AM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote: > At 10:08 PM -0500 3/28/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >So I'm going to punt on this one and let you folks decide if Craig's > >is too slow and needs work. I'll only take a full patch, though. > > The attached uuencoded patch is working for me with bleadperl and > both MMS and MMK, including the "install" target. It uses DCL > instead of Perl in some of the places where that might contribute > speed and/or simplicity, especially when we can avoid loading the > File::Spec module.
So before I accept this, did it actually have a noticable effect on the speed of installation? > It has no effect on the test suite, which tonight > is unfortunately looking worse than yesterday: > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > t/basic.t 44 1024 14 3 21.43% 10-12 > t/installed.t 44 1024 42 3 7.14% 9 29-30 > t/manifest.t 44 1024 32 1 3.12% 32 > > I will attempt to look into these tomorrow. Does 5.54_01 help basic.t at all? -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One That which stirs me, stirs everything. -- Squonk Opera, "Spoon"
