This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the 
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + 

On 4/10/2010 3:21 AM, David Bradbury wrote:
According to www.britannica.fr/Lettre4/HistoireMesure.html
la lieue de 20 au degré = 2850 toises = 5 555 m.: également appelée /grande lieue de France/ ou /lieue marine/ ou /*lieue d'une heure de chemin*/.

I cannot help but wonder if the Britannica statement packages this too neatly: http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/Measurement.html .

   "In France, on the other hand, there was no standardisation and as
   late as 1788 Arthur Young wrote in "/Travels during the years /1787,
   1788, 1789" published in 1793:-

       /In France the infinite perplexity of the measures exceeds all
       comprehension. They differ not only in every province, but in
       every district and almost every town./

   In fact it has been estimated that France had about 800 different
   names for measures at this time, and taking into account their
   different values in different towns, around 250,000 differently
   sized units. To a certain extent this reflected the powers which
   resided in the hands of local nobles who had resisted all attempts
   by the French King over centuries to standardise measures. Diderot
   and d'Alembert
   <http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/D%27Alembert.html>
   in their /Encyclopédie/ greatly regretted the diversity, but saw no
   possible acceptable solution to the problem. Some French scientists
   had proposed uniform systems at least 100 years before the French
   Revolution. Gabriel Mouton
   <http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Mouton.html>, in
   1670, had suggested that the world should adopt a uniform scale of
   measurement based on the mille, which he defined as the length of
   one minute of the Earth's arc. He proposed that decimal subdivisions
   should be used to determine the lengths of shorter units of length.
   Lalande
   <http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Lalande.html>,
   in April 1789, proposed that the measures used in Paris should
   become national ones, an attempt at standardisation but not
   rationalisation. This proposal was put to the National Assembly in
   February 1790 but in March a different suggestion was made.
   Talleyrand put to the National Assembly a proposal due to Condorcet
   <http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Condorcet.html>,
   namely that a new measurement system be adopted based on a length
   from nature. The system should have decimal subdivisions, all
   measures of area, volume, weight etc should be linked to the
   fundamental unit of length. The basic length should be that of a
   pendulum which beat at the rate of one second. The proposal was
   adopted."


I am not attempting to assert any definitive accuracy for the above statement, but given that the de Fer map-making family was deceased by the early 18th century, it does not seem likely that the "lieue d'une heure de chemin" was that well standardized at the time of the map's production.

              Joel Kovarsky

_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl

Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist

Reply via email to