This is a MapHist list message. News: If you don't get messages anymore, go to http://www.maphist.nl for news about the new MapHist Forum o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
Bravo, George! I always tell people they should buy because they love the map and want to see it on their wall. Yes, sometimes maps become more valuable, but that is not the prime reason for buying. I, too, agree with the ILAB's stance on investment selling. Dee Dee Longenbaugh The Observatory, ABAA 299 North Franklin Street Juneau, Alaska, 99801 www.observatorybooks.com deel...@alaska.com Since 1977 Alaska specialists > Lichen on the rock ignores a nearby lightning strike, and so it is > with cartographers. B.E.W. Allen On Dec 23, 2011, at 12:01 PM, George Ritzlin wrote: > This is a MapHist list message. > News: If you don't get messages anymore, go to http://www.maphist.nl for news > about the new MapHist Forum > o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + > > > I agree with Dorothy, Ed and Joel. There is good reason for the ILAB’s > proscription against suggesting rare books (and maps) are an investment. > Aside from the uncertain economics of "investing" in art, such an approach is > antithetical to collecting. > > We, too, hear the investment question in our gallery and our standard reply > is "you get your dividends by looking at and studying these maps. If there is > residual value at the end, treat it as a bonus." We also suggest a minimum > holding period of twenty years to overcome the high transaction costs of the > collectible market, and tell people the best financial results have gone to > those who are the true collectors. They buy the best maps they can afford and > hold them as long as possible. "Investing" in maps or art is a bit like Zen – > you hit the target by not aiming at it. > > It is worthwhile to consider a longer history than ten years. If I recall > correctly, when Professor Koeman wrote his little booklet on Blaeu’s Grand > Atlas he observed that the price of the atlas went nowhere for two centuries. > It is only in more recent times that prices rose. > > The general price increases we think of as continuous really began in the > early 20th century (some economists argue the late 19th century), and were > preceded by nearly a century of no inflation or disinflation. > > For those interested in the broad sweep of prices I commend David Hackett > Fischer’s "The Great Wave: Price Revolutions and the Rhythm of History" on > European prices since the building of the Cathedral of Chartes, which > demonstrates that patterns of price change are quite uneven over time. > > Given the present economic uncertainty, it would be presumptuous to suggest > recent trends will continue unabated. > > For something closer to the map market, read Gerald Reitlinger’s three-volume > "The Economics of Taste" on the rise and fall of prices for paintings and > objets de art, from the mid-18th century to the mid-20th century. I can think > of no better way to conclude than to cite Mr. Reitlinger’s introduction to > his third volume (published 1970, pages 11-12). > > "It cannot be denied that enormous profits have been made in the past two > decades by those who followed fashionable trends...in order to sell-out a few > year later, but these are not investors but speculators. The only investors > are those who never meant to invest at all. Those who bought some twenty > years ago...may have seen their treasures multiply in value... But they will > either have ceased to collect altogether or they will have joined the general > rat-race, selling dear in order to buy even dearer. Those who bought from > income or pin-money will compete with those who pledge their entire capital. > That is the meaning of art as an investment, nothing less than the extinction > of true collecting." > > George Ritzlin > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Geographicus Antique Maps > To: 'Discussion group for map history' > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 1:37 PM > Subject: RE: [MapHist] Alternative Investing 2011 - Mappinga > Profit:Cartography and Fine Art Investment - CNBC > > This is a MapHist list message. > News: If you don't get messages anymore, go to http://www.maphist.nl for news > about the new MapHist Forum > o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + > > > > > Joel – > > We do not advise clients to purchase maps for investment purposes – though we > like all dealers invest in old maps and must recognize that they do have > investment value, and I am not talking about 3% inflation. As with any > physical object, be it a house, a car, or an old map, liquidity is an issue, > but it is an issue that anyone purchasing such an object is aware of upfront. > Also like any investment, investors in physical objects need a knowledge > base regarding what they are buying. Just as one does not randomly purchase > stock or houses or cars and expect get rich, one should exercise the same > caution in acquiring an antique. Strategic knowledge-based acquisitions > however (from dealers and from other venues like auctions) can yield handsome > profits over time. If it were not so dealers would all be in the poorhouse. > The premise behind fine art investment funds is as sound as and bears a > similar risk level as any object asset investment – I see no reason why such > funds should not include historical artifacts, like maps, as part of their > acquisition portfolios. > > Kevin > > > From: maphist-boun...@geo.uu.nl [mailto:maphist-boun...@geo.uu.nl] On Behalf > Of Joel Kovarsky > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 1:21 PM > To: Discussion group for map history > Subject: Re: [MapHist] Alternative Investing 2011 - Mapping a > Profit:Cartography and Fine Art Investment - CNBC > > I think this is different than the point Dorothy Sloan was making, which was > seconded by Ed Dahl. The idea that the price of any good rises over time and > with inflation is quite different than the recommendation of using old maps > as an investment strategy. This business is hardly the equivalent of an index > fund, and has none of the liquidity or regulatory constraints that go into > financial vehicles (OK, I know recent history questions some of the > regulatory issues). I think you tread on very thin ice advising someone to > use old maps as a significant investment vehicle. The ILAB (and IAMA) Code of > Ethics rightly admonish not to use these materials as "investment schemes." > The idea of investing in maps has something in common with investing in art, > so that the higher end of the market is likely to yield the best returns over > time: you had better have both funding and knowledge to forage that world on > a consistent basis. And there are exceptions to everything. > > Joel Kovarsky > > On 12/23/2011 12:04 PM, Geographicus Antique Maps wrote: > This is a MapHist list message. > News: If you don't get messages anymore, go to http://www.maphist.nl for news > about the new MapHist Forum > o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + > > > > > > Ed – > > I disagree. “Is my map likely to increase in value over time?” is one of the > most common questions dealers are asked. In is not unethical to answer > truthfully. While we always encourage our clients to purchase maps first > because they enjoy them and not directly as an investment, the answer to this > question is “most likely”. In the short term, unless you are a dealer or > very savvy, it is indeed difficult to purchase a map at a retail gallery and > turn a profit, however, in the long term there is significant potential for > profit. The historical increase in map value over a considerable time (10+ > years) is chartable to anyone with access to historical sales data – which > should be pretty much everyone in this list. While certain maps, like the > stock market, can bubble in value for short periods of time, the overall and > consistent trend is for maps to increase in value as time passes. Most > dealers, like ourselves, price maps in accordance with historical retail and > auction values for similar items. On such a model a natural increase in > value can be reasonably anticipated. > > Kevin > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography > hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht. > The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of > the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of > Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for > the views of the author. > List Information: http://www.maphist.nl > > Maphist mailing list > Maphist@geo.uu.nl > http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist > _______________________________________________ > MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography > hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht. > The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of > the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of > Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for > the views of the author. > List Information: http://www.maphist.nl > > Maphist mailing list > Maphist@geo.uu.nl > http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
_______________________________________________ MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. List Information: http://www.maphist.nl Maphist mailing list Maphist@geo.uu.nl http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
