A while back someone, maybe Thomas Bonfort, did some performance tests comparing GD to AGG, and if I recall AGG was only slightly slower and in at least a couple of cases it was faster the GD.
In our case, GD renders in 1 second and AGG in 3 in these few tests cases we're concerned with. We're thus allowing a choice between "fast mode" and "good quality mode"
Also I should point out that the GD renderer is getting removed So I'm not sure there is much interest in chasing issue
Well, that's good to know. Thanks for the heads-up. I'll wait and see if someone comes up with any ideas before I give up entirely.
-- HostGIS, Open Source solutions for the global GIS community Greg Allensworth - SysAdmin, Programmer, GIS Person, Security Network+ Server+ A+ Security+ Linux+ PHP PostgreSQL MySQL DHTML/JavaScript/AJAX "No one cares if you can back up — only if you can recover." _______________________________________________ mapserver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
