On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 06:12:43 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On 05/Jul/11 20:48, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > Ignoring redaction for the moment, what we have now is: > > > > - authfailure-report modifies ARF > > - dkim-reporting modifies DKIM and ADSP > > - spf-reporting modifies SPF > > > > That seems nice and clean. Your proposal changes it to: > > > > - authfailure-report modifies ARF > > - dkim-reporting modifies DKIM and ADSP, and also modifies > > authfailure-report - spf-reporting modifies SPF, and also modifies > > authfailure-report > > > > At a glance the first method seems cleaner to me. On the other > > hand, the latter is a more clear demonstration of how future email > > authentication methods will need to create reporting hooks. > > A more realistic advantage of the second method is to allow editing, > say, dkim-reporting without having to negotiate dkim-related > modifications with a given version of authfailure-report. > > > What do others think? And let's try to make this the last revisit > > of the arrangement of this work so that we can make some progress. > > +1
I'm happy either way. I would like a decision to be made soon so we can get updated drafts in prior to the July 11 cutoff. Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
