> Ignoring redaction for the moment, what we have now is: > > - authfailure-report modifies ARF > - dkim-reporting modifies DKIM and ADSP > - spf-reporting modifies SPF > > That seems nice and clean. Your proposal changes it to: > > - authfailure-report modifies ARF > - dkim-reporting modifies DKIM and ADSP, and also modifies authfailure-report > - spf-reporting modifies SPF, and also modifies authfailure-report > > At a glance the first method seems cleaner to me. On the other hand, the > latter is a more clear demonstration of how future email authentication > methods will need to create reporting hooks. > > What do others think?
I think I marginally prefer Alessandro's proposal. But it's a very marginal preference -- I think either arrangement will work fine. Barry, as participant _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
