> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank > Ellermann > Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 11:06 AM > To: SM > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Comments on draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-01.txt > > BTW, the draft does not mention Sender-ID at all. I take this > as another indication that this "experiment" is now obsolete; > RFC 4407 (PRA) was cute, but RFC 4405 (SUBMITTER) was a "FUSSP".
I don't think MARF is in a position to be able to make that statement explicitly. Further, since we appear to be in agreement that the authentication results reported by this draft should include only those things that were actually tested, and not a fixed set, it seems including a "sender-id" result is on the table. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
