On 2 October 2011 01:38, SM wrote: > The term purported sender sounds like one borrowed from SPF.
Not really, did you confuse this with the "PRA" in Sender-ID? The "PRA" concept was not adopted or acknowledged in the later RFCs 4409bis and 5321. My somewhat irregular summary would be that nobody was thrilled by the fine print of a "Resent-Sender". > DKIM does not use such a term. IIRC at some point in time DKIM tackled "authors" (5322-From), and whatever that is, it is certainly not always the "sender", let alone the PRA. But for ordinary humans not knowing these infamous terminology difficulties "purported sender" might be vague enough to cover the different concepts (?). BTW, the draft does not mention Sender-ID at all. I take this as another indication that this "experiment" is now obsolete; RFC 4407 (PRA) was cute, but RFC 4405 (SUBMITTER) was a "FUSSP". -Frank _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
