> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Scott Kitterman > Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 12:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] Comments on draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-01.txt > > Does it have a constituency? There are quite a number of auth methods covered > in auth-results that we don't cover and I don't think we should extend beyone > SPF/DKIM unless someone needs it.
If we're insisting that we not say you have to report specific ones, then being completely agnostic seems the right path to me. _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
