On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Scott Kitterman >> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 12:22 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [marf] Comments on draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-01.txt >> >> Does it have a constituency? There are quite a number of auth methods >> covered >> in auth-results that we don't cover and I don't think we should extend beyone >> SPF/DKIM unless someone needs it. > > If we're insisting that we not say you have to report specific ones, then > being completely agnostic seems the right path to me. >
+1 _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
