> Not entirely. I think that encouraging people to send unsolicited, non-human-readable > email to email addresses harvested from domain or IP registration addresses, > or to role accounts intended to receive human readable email, isn't a good idea > and we might want to spend more space on the problems with that. ... > My preference would be to focus on use of ARF format for solicited reports > in this document, rip out section 8 altogether and concentrate on that issue > more in a separate document that could provide more depth, more focus on > the difficulties with unsolicited reports that this one glosses over, possibly > combined with the work on advertising desire to receive machine-readable > reports. Expanding section 8 into a deeper discussion in this document > might work too. The rest of it looks fine, though, so if that doesn't happen > I'd consider -06 OK.
I'll leave it to Murray to say for sure what input he wants, but I'll note that at this stage in the document's life cycle, giving the editor specific text that you propose to be included/changed is probably the most productive approach. Barry, border collie
_______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
