> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jacob > R Rideout > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:36 PM > To: Pete Resnick > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-as-12.txt > > For the ARF reports we generate, we always use "Feedback-Type: abuse", > but add an Abuse-Type field that describes the origin of the abuse. > Currently this is one of complaint, trap, trap-pristine, or trap- > recycled. Are we suggesting that these types should be used in place of > abuse for Feedback-Type? Section 5.2.1 makes it clear that the specific > meaning of abuse might require additional analysis.
The legal values for Feedback-Type are registered. Doing what you're suggesting would render your ARF messages non-compliant. You should leave it how it is, or register your new types (which requires specification). > Are generators of unsolicited report also required to respect 6.1.1? > Does this establish some type of opt-out regime? Section 6 talks about unsolicited reports, so yes to both questions. -MSK _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
